[Openmcl-devel] OpenMCL and Tiger status

Gary Byers gb at clozure.com
Thu Apr 28 00:24:45 UTC 2005



nOn Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Brian Mastenbrook wrote:

> On Apr 27, 2005, at 5:30 PM, Gary Byers wrote:
>
>> 0.14.3 still runs under Jaguar (I just tried.)  Rebuilding the kernel
>> fails (because of some header file problem; I hadn't tried that before.)
>> I checked a fix into the main CVS tree.
>> 
>> 0.14.4 might not (I haven't checked to see if anything I've done recently
>> might break under Jaguar.)
>> 
>> The new interface translator is based on GCC 4.0; I'm not sure if it's
>> possible to build GCC 4.0 under Jaguar, or if a binary buit on Panther
>> or later will run under Jaguar (it may need a more modern C library
>> than Jaguar provides.)
>> 
>> I'll try to test things under Jaguar before releasing 0.14.4; if I can
>> catch little things like the missing header file issue, I'll try to do
>> so (and it might indeed be a pleasant surprise if most things work.)
>
> A binary built on Panther will run on Jaguar. A binary built on Tiger will 
> not. I don't know how to get around this currently: the most obvious problem 
> is that even a Hello, World binary built on Tiger depends on libmx, which is 
> not present on Jaguar. A secondary problem is that if your application 
> defines a symbol with the same name as a C library symbol (notably for 
> providing functions like dlopen and nl_langinfo not present on Jaguar, or 
> making them actually /work/ on Panther), the binary built on Tiger still 
> seems to depend on these symbols being present in the C library, so it will 
> fail to load with an unresolved symbol error on Jaguar. I don't know why this 
> is. For now, I'm giving up on Jaguar support for SBCL because of these 
> issues; you may also find them an issue with OpenMCL.
>
> Brian Mastenbrook
> brian at mastenbrook.net
> http://www.iscblog.info/
>


When built on Tiger, the OpenMCL kernel happens not to link against
libmx; an OpenMCL kernel built on Tiger (about a minute ago) seems to
run fine under 10.2.8.

This is (partly) blind luck; it seems reasonable to assume that sooner
or later, that luck will run out and it'll become prohibitively difficult
to continue to simultaneously support Jaguar and move forward.






More information about the Openmcl-devel mailing list