[Openmcl-devel] Profiling Parenscript compilation

Scott Bell sblist at me.com
Wed Dec 3 19:56:21 UTC 2008


Hi folks,

We have a series of Parenscript `scripts' that seem to be quite  
expensive to
compile under most Lisps. SBCL takes between 8 and 12 seconds, and CCL
takes up to 90 seconds.

In my attempts to locate the most expensive calls, I have used CHUD- 
METERING,
Apple's Instruments profiler, and out-of-the-box Shark. Since these do  
not
seem to be able to profile Lisp functions, I'm at a bit of a loss on  
how to proceed.

Does anyone have any advice?

Thanks,

- Scott Bell



More information about the Openmcl-devel mailing list