[Openmcl-devel] CCL is a mess
danieldickison at gmail.com
Wed May 27 17:15:41 UTC 2009
On May 27, 2009, at 12:59 PM, Rainer Joswig wrote:
> The next question is 'user expectation'. What kind of IDE are users
> * Eclipse-like, because the users are students and know mostly
> Eclipse? An MCL-like IDE will not do it for them. They want windows
> full of widgets, wizards, tiled windows, large preference dialogues,
> lots of XML configuration files, ...
> * MCL-like, because the users are homeless ex-MCL users?
> * XCode-like, because the CCL IDE users are on the Mac anyway?
> * Somehow integrating with Xcode and some of its tools (Interface
> Builder, ...)?
> * Emacs/SLIME-like?
> * Something new?
> * None? Because they use Emacs/SLIME or Eclipse with Lisp support?
I would think something Xcode-like would be ideal, especially with
integrated support for Interface Builder. I don't see emulating Emacs
as a benefit, since, if you want Emacs, you could always use Aquamacs
and SLIME instead.
More information about the Openmcl-devel