[Openmcl-devel] Problem with ccl:macroexpand-all and flet of setf functions.
lisp at davidb.org
Wed Jan 12 17:26:00 UTC 2011
I ran into this last night using slime. The following signals a
(ccl:macroexpand-all '(flet (((setf foo) (value) bar)) body))
> Error: Malformed :FUNCTION list: #1=(SETF FOO) is not a symbol in (#1#).
> While executing: (:INTERNAL CCL::CHECK-ALL-SYMBOLS CCL::CHECK-ENVIRONMENT-ARGS), in process listener(1).
Using a macro with this expansion works with the compiler, it just fails
when expanding using Slime.
Should I create a ticket for this?
The macro I was writing is below.
;;; Inspired by ASIF from the Anaphora package, but disappointed that
;;; ASIF evaluates the insides of the test for each test. This macro
;;; is used like LET*, but the names of the bindings can be used with
;;; SETF and friends. The components of the init-forms are only
;;; evaluated once.
(defmacro place-let (bindings &body body &environment env)
"Similar to LET*, but the names in BINDINGS are bound in such a way
that SETF/SETQ will work on them."
(let ((accessor (gensym "ACCESS"))
(value (gensym "VALUE")))
(multiple-value-bind (dummies vals new setter getter)
(get-setf-expansion (cadar bindings) env)
`(let* (,@(mapcar #'list dummies vals)
(,(car new) ,getter))
(flet ((,accessor ()
((setf ,accessor) (,value)
(setf ,(car new) ,value)
(symbol-macrolet ((,(caar bindings) (,accessor)))
(setq ,(car new) ,getter)
(place-let ,(cdr bindings) , at body))))))
`(progn , at body)))
;;; Test demonstrating the macro. Expanding the place-let in Slime
;;; signals the condition.
(defparameter *table* (make-hash-table))
(defun get-item (key)
(place-let ((entry (gethash key *table*)))
(let ((new-entry (cons key (gensym))))
(setf entry new-entry)
More information about the Openmcl-devel