[Openmcl-devel] asdf-install and asdf in the openmcl distributions
gb at clozure.com
Sat Jan 17 21:14:48 PST 2004
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Camille Troillard wrote:
> I vote for including it too !
> If you look at PLT Scheme, they have a way to distribute/install
> libraries easily. MOst of the Lisps lack this and I found it was a
> very good idea to have it included in SBCL. Then I was confused that
> OpenMCL don't have these very useful tools ...
I'm not arguing against including this package (or anything else deemed
to be a "useful tool") with distributions. I do have some questions
about doing that.
- what version of asdf-install should be included ?
- what else does it depend on, and what versions of those things ?
(I assume ASDF in this case)
- quite reasonably, the README file for asdf-install discusses
using it with SBCL. Should a README.OpenMCL file be added,
that at least points people to the HTML documentation in the
portable version ?
- I'd personally agree that many people would find asdf-install
useful. Exactly which things are so useful that they should
be bundled, and how should that be decided ?
There may be simple answers to these questions, and the fact that
I'm asking them may just indicate that I haven't thought enough
about these issues. If people have thought about these things,
I'd appreciate hearing their opinions.
More information about the Openmcl-devel