[Openmcl-devel] OpenMCL funding and development priorities
david at david-steuber.com
Mon Aug 29 16:52:03 UTC 2005
On Aug 29, 2005, at 8:00 AM, Gail Zacharias wrote:
> We (Clozure) are committed to OpenMCL's future, but to remain a viable
> business, we have to give priority to paid projects. This means that
> OpenMCL will primarily develop in those directions that our paying
> need and pay for - whether directly (by funding some specific OpenMCL
> development) or indirectly (by buying support and development for their
> application that requires us to improve OpenMCL as a side-effect).
> that do not have funding can only be supported on a volunteer or spare
> time basis, which will necessarily be slower and more spotty.
> So the answer is the same for PPC architecture, Linux, the OpenMCL IDE
> and anything else - the honest answer is yes if there are clients
> to pay for it, otherwise - maybe. If you have a funded project, you
> ensure OpenMCL will continue to meet your needs by writing OpenMCL
> into your budget/grant.
For the first time ever I just had a look at http://www.clozure.com/.
I've always wondered, but never bothered to ask, how is OpenMCL funded?
What parts of OpenMCL are currently getting the paid development
Also, with Apple's move to Intel, is a Linux/x86 OpenMCL in the future?
(or perhaps some other Linux/intel architecture since Apple, to my
knowledge, hasn't been too specific about what the final Intel CPU will
be other than the dev boxes using the PIV).
More information about the Openmcl-devel