Fwd: [Openmcl-devel] forward declare an ObjC message?
beer at eecs.cwru.edu
Fri Feb 11 00:38:25 UTC 2005
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Randall Beer <beer at eecs.cwru.edu>
> Date: February 10, 2005 7:37:58 PM EST
> To: Gary Byers <gb at clozure.com>
> Subject: Re: [Openmcl-devel] forward declare an ObjC message?
>>> The only way to forward reference messages would be to "explain"
>>> types to the bridge. It should be possible to write such a utility
>>> makes an entry in the type signature table fairly easily, but
>>> essentially it would be equivalent to giving a DEFINE-OBJC-MESSAGE
>>> definition with an empty body.
>> I wonder if it'd be possible/easy to do something like (not sure of
>> (declare-objc-message ((:void show-me) a-window))
>> which would basically have the effect of describing the message
>> without saying anything about the implementation ? (That's sort of
>> happens when libraries are imported now, and it happens as a
>> of DEFINE-OBJC-METHOD, as well.)
>> (The idea is that this would provide a way to tell SEND what it needed
>> to know to compile calls efficiently, without forcing methods to be
>> implemented before calls to them can be compiled.)
>> Without thinking about it too hard, I -think- that that'd be fairly
>> easy to do. (Famous last words.)
> This is what I meant by "explaining" a method's arg types to the
> bridge. I don't think that should be hard at all. Basically, it should
> just involve a version of UPDATE-TYPE-SIGNATURES-FOR-METHOD in
> BRIDGE.LISP that doesn't require a method, but does require type info
> so that the appropriate MSG-DESC can be built or updated.
More information about the Openmcl-devel