[Openmcl-devel] OpenMCL 1.0-rc1

R. Mattes rm at seid-online.de
Sun Sep 25 06:09:52 PDT 2005

On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 18:13 -0600, Gary Byers wrote:
> There are now "full" (sources+binaries+interfaces) 1.0-rc1-050924
> archives available in the testing directory on clozure.com
> (<ftp://clozure.com/pub/testing/>), as well as archives containing
> heap images for 32-bit Darwin, 64-bit Darwin, and 32-bit Linux.

Just downloaded the tarball but unfortunately the binary (ppccl)
has rather restricting library dependencies: 

  ldd ppccl 
  ./ppccl: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3.4' not found (required
by ./ppccl)
  ./ppccl: /lib/libpthread.so.0: version `GLIBC_2.3.4' not found
(required by ./ppccl)
  ./ppccl: /lib/libpthread.so.0: version `GLIBC_2.3.3' not found
(required by ./ppccl)
	libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x0fd50000)
	libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x0fde0000)
	libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x0fd70000)
	libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x0fe70000)
	/lib/ld.so.1 => /lib/ld.so.1 (0x0ffd0000)

Is this really neccessary? (My test box is a G4 running Ubuntu Linux/PPC

> The "full" Darwin archive contains 32-bit and 64-bit kernels and
> heap images; the 64-bit image is fairly large and might be of limited
> interest, so we might want to think about other ways of packaging
> things.
> These are supposed to be "release candidates", i.e., the only changes
> between now and the final 1.0 release should be in response to any
> critical (showstopper) bugs.  The CVS metainformation in the archives
> is from the bleeding-edge tree; as 1.0 nears release, the code should
> all migrate into the main tree, and the "ccl" directory installed from
> these archives should probably be replaced with the official release
> when it becomes available.

Can i recompile the tarball using a CVS checkout?

 Cheers, Ralf Mattes

More information about the Openmcl-devel mailing list