[Openmcl-devel] linux 2.6.23
Takehiko Abe
keke at gol.com
Sat Oct 27 06:23:38 PDT 2007
Sorry for my slow reply.
> I saw something that looks very similar when trying to run under a
> FreeBSD 7.0 prerelease a few weeks ago.
>
> In that case, the problem had something to do with library
> names/version numbers changing; the lisp image remembered that it
> had been using (for example, I don't remember the exact details)
> "libc.so.N"; the dynamic linker actually opened "libc.so.N+1", and
> the function %REVIVE-SHARED-LIBRARIES - which tries to re-open
> things that had been opened by OPEN-SHARED-LIBRARY before the image
> was saved - got confused by the presence of the new C library.
I use (I assume I am using) the same set of libraries with kernel
2.6.22 and 2.6.23. Is it still possible that library names a culprit?
I am going to try older prerelease version of 2.6.23.
(I am happy with kernel 2.6.22 though I was just curious about the new
kernel.)
Thanks,
T.
More information about the Openmcl-devel
mailing list