[Openmcl-devel] Profiling Parenscript compilation
Scott Bell
sblist at me.com
Wed Dec 3 11:56:21 PST 2008
Hi folks,
We have a series of Parenscript `scripts' that seem to be quite
expensive to
compile under most Lisps. SBCL takes between 8 and 12 seconds, and CCL
takes up to 90 seconds.
In my attempts to locate the most expensive calls, I have used CHUD-
METERING,
Apple's Instruments profiler, and out-of-the-box Shark. Since these do
not
seem to be able to profile Lisp functions, I'm at a bit of a loss on
how to proceed.
Does anyone have any advice?
Thanks,
- Scott Bell
More information about the Openmcl-devel
mailing list