[Openmcl-devel] Problem with read-sequence on binary streams
p2.edoc at googlemail.com
p2.edoc at googlemail.com
Wed Jun 11 07:13:57 PDT 2008
I wondered if it should be (read-byte stream nil :eof)
but then there are plenty of other (read-byte stream) calls that seem
to anticipate EOF conditions return :eof.
At 7:49 AM -0400 08/06/11, Bill St. Clair wrote:
>The difference, in case anyone, like me, didn't notice it at first
>blush, is changing "read-byte" to "stream-read-byte".
>
>-Bill
>
>On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Wade Humeniuk
><wade.humeniuk at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Through using Drakma I believe I have a found a bug for
>>stream-read-vector for
>> binary streams. The problem thread can be found on the drakma-devel
>> mailing list
>>
>> http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/drakma-devel/2008-June/000314.html
>>
>> The routine is in ./cct/level-1/l1-streams.lisp
>>
>> the method
>>
>> (defmethod stream-read-vector ((stream binary-input-stream)
>> vector start end)
>> (declare (fixnum start end))
>> (do* ((i start (1+ i)))
>> ((= i end) end)
>> (declare (fixnum i))
> > (let* ((b (read-byte stream)))
>> (if (eq b :eof)
>> (return i)
>> (setf (uvref vector i) b)))))
>>
>> probably should be changed to...
>>
>> (defmethod stream-read-vector ((stream binary-input-stream)
>> vector start end)
>> (declare (fixnum start end))
>> (do* ((i start (1+ i)))
>> ((= i end) end)
>> (declare (fixnum i))
>> (let* ((b (stream-read-byte stream)))
>> (if (eq b :eof)
>> (return i)
> > (setf (uvref vector i) b)))))
More information about the Openmcl-devel
mailing list