[Openmcl-devel] SLOT-UNBOUND broken?
gb at clozure.com
Wed May 6 14:54:51 PDT 2009
What I find is that it seems to work fine on all ppc and x86-64
platforms that I've tried it on and on 32-bit x86 Darwin, Windows,
Solaris, and FreeBSD. On 32-bit x86 Linux, the unbound slot causes a
trap (as it should on all platforms); the lisp kernel calls out to a
lisp handler, the handler (seems to) call the appropriate SLOT-UNBOUND
method, and when it returns to the lisp kernel, something is very,
Ah. In general, returning/continuing after an error trap seems to be broken
on 32-bit x86 Linux:
? (defvar *x*)
? (defun foo () *x*)
> Error: Unbound variable: *X*
> While executing: FOO, in process listener(1).
> Type :GO to continue, :POP to abort, :R for a list of available restarts.
> If continued: Retry getting the value of *X*.
> Type :? for other options.
1 > (use-value 1)
-> crashes very hard for me; it even kills the process.
On Wed, 6 May 2009, Leslie P. Polzer wrote:
> The following code (from the test suite) fails horribly
> on my machine:
> (defclass slot-unbound-class-01 ()
> ((a :reader sunb-a)
> (b :accessor sunb-b)
> (c :writer sunb-c)
> (e :reader sunb-e)
> (f :reader sunb-f)))
> (defmethod slot-unbound ((class t) (obj slot-unbound-class-01) (slot-name t))
> (list (class-name class) slot-name))
> (let ((obj (make-instance 'slot-unbound-class-01)))
> (slot-value obj 'a)
> (slot-value obj 'b)
> (slot-value obj 'c)))
> Here's some more information:
>  Clozure CL kernel debugger: b
> current thread: tcr = 0xb7c12a90, native thread ID = 0x432a, interrupts enabled
> (#xB7AADD44) #x00000000 : #<Function %MAYBE-STD-SLOT-VALUE-USING-CLASS #x14142EDE> + ??
> (#xB7AADD7C) #x14CB40C5 : #<Anonymous Function #x14CB4076> + 79
> (#xB7AADD90) #x14A3001D : #<Function (:INTERNAL %DO DO-ENTRY) #x14A2FD3E> + 735
> (#xB7AADDA0) #x14A309FD : #<Function DO-ENTRY #x14A3061E> + 991
> (#xB7AADDE4) #x14A3B335 : #<Function DO-ENTRIES #x14A3B1AE> + 391
> (#xB7AADDF8) #x14A3C00D : #<Function DO-TESTS #x14A3BD66> + 679
> (#xB7AADE5C) #x14891EE5 : #<Function REPORT-TIME #x14891DAE> + 311
> (#xB7AADE94) #x143802FD : #<Function CALL-CHECK-REGS #x14380206> + 247
> (#xB7AADEB0) #x143E467D : #<Function (:INTERNAL EVAL-STRING STARTUP-CCL) #x143E44BE> + 447
> (#xB7AADED4) #x143E4D5D : #<Function STARTUP-CCL #x143E4786> + 1495
> (#xB7AADF04) #x14329A65 : #<Function (:INTERNAL (TOPLEVEL-FUNCTION
> (LISP-DEVELOPMENT-SYSTEM T))) #x14329A1E> + 71
> (#xB7AADF14) #x143E357D : #<Function (:INTERNAL MAKE-MCL-LISTENER-PROCESS) #x143E3336> +
> (#xB7AADF60) #x1433030D : #<Function RUN-PROCESS-INITIAL-FORM #x1433006E> + 671
> (#xB7AADFA4) #x14330C9D : #<Function (:INTERNAL (%PROCESS-PRESET-INTERNAL (PROCESS)))
> #x14330B4E> + 335
> (#xB7AADFCC) #x1431856D : #<Function (:INTERNAL THREAD-MAKE-STARTUP-FUNCTION)
> #x14318456> + 279
>  Clozure CL kernel debugger: L
> %ebx (arg_z) = #<header ? #xFFFFFFFF>
> %esi (arg_y) = #<header ? #x08060F67>
> %edi (fn) = #<header ? #xFFFFFFFF>
> %ecx (temp0) = 0
> %edx (temp1) = marked as unboxed (DF set)
> %edx (nargs) = -303020452 (maybe)
> Intriguingly one of the registers pointed at a vector in an earlier
> session; now the addresses seem to be bogus.
> On a tangent, is there a way to instrument low-level functions
> (like the %maybe-std-slot-value-using-class) with print statements?
One issue with doing so is that you want to avoid the infinite recursion
that'd occur when PRINT calls %MAYBE-STD-SLOT-VALUE-USING-CLASS (which now
calls some flavor of PRINT, which eventually tries to tell you that the
stack has overflowed but can't do that without PRINTing ...)
> I've tried it but then rebuiling CCL would fail at the heap
> building stage.
Yup. (It's probably true that %MAYBE-STD-SLOT-VALUE-USING-CLASS gets called
before anything has any idea of what a STREAM is, much less how to print to one.)
What sort of works (doesn't scale well but avoids recursion/bootstrapping issues)
is to use CCL::DBG to enter the kernel debugger, which can sort of (if you squint)
print lisp objects (some better than others.) CCL::DBG's optional argument gets
loaded into the arg_z register (%ebx on x8632), and you can sometimes make
sense of arg_z in the kernel debugger's L output.
In this particular case, it looks to me like everything on the lisp side (at least
up until the unbound slot is discovered) is OK:
? (slot-value (make-instance 'example) 'slot)
> Error: Slot SLOT is unbound in #<EXAMPLE #x14B352CE>
> While executing: #<STANDARD-KERNEL-METHOD SLOT-UNBOUND (T T T)>, in process listener(1).
> Type :POP to abort, :R for a list of available restarts.
> Type :? for other options.
and we call (in this case) the default SLOT-UNBOUND method; the bug seems to have
to do with being able to return to the point where the unbound slot was discovered
in the case where SLOT-UNBOUND tries to return a value. (And, apparently, with
continuing after an error that generates a trap on x8632 Linux in general. All
of that code is machine- and OS-dependent.)
> I also attempted to look at some symbols but the kernel debugger
> seems to have a different idea of what a symbol means as it couldn't
> find any I asked it about.
? for help
 Clozure CL kernel debugger: s
symbol name :READ-CHAR ; it doesn't upper-case the pname for you
Symbol READ-CHAR at #x140A60E6
value : #<Unbound>
function : #<Function READ-CHAR #x1470522E>
All that that debugger function does is to scan the lisp heap until it finds
a symbol whose pname matches the (case-sensitive) string that you enter; if
it finds such a symbol, it shows its global function and value cell values.
> Openmcl-devel mailing list
> Openmcl-devel at clozure.com
More information about the Openmcl-devel