[Openmcl-devel] Speed, compilers and multi-core processors
mevins at mac.com
Tue May 19 16:39:07 PDT 2009
On May 19, 2009, at 1:39 PM, Jeremy Jones wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Dan Weinreb <dlw at itasoftware.com>
>> And you know what other language works this way?
>> Clojure, a very promising new dialect of Lisp.
>> -- Dan
> I'd like to endorse the approach taken by Clojure (the other Closure)
> too. It is a dialect of Lisp that where a central design decision was
> to make almost all data structures immutable. This obviates most of
> the need for locking, a common performance issue for multi-threaded
> programs. It is easy to write programs that rarely use shared,
> mutable data structures. And when you do need shared, mutable data
> structures, the locking is explicit. Take a look at a
> http://clojure.blip.tv/file/1313398/ for an introduction to Clojure
> for Lisp programmers. I wasn't expecting much, but it's really good.
> Someone could define a version of Common Lisp with these
It wouldn't be Common Lisp, or, if it was still Common Lisp, the
Clojure features wouldn't buy you much. See my other message on the
subject. In order to get Clojure's benefits for concurrency, you have
to say goodbye to SETQ.
More information about the Openmcl-devel