[Openmcl-devel] CCL on Solaris sparc architecture
ron at flownet.com
Wed Jan 27 17:16:27 UTC 2010
On Jan 27, 2010, at 12:34 AM, Helmut Eller wrote:
> * Ron Garret [2010-01-27 09:13+0100] writes:
>> Why not just use ABCL?
> ABCL's front-end+library are not as mature as CCL's.
What front end? What library? Do you mean the GUI? That won't work on a JVM back end anyway.
CCL is cool mainly for two reasons: 1) it compiles to native code so it's fast, and 2) it has the ObjC bridge, so you can easily access Cocoa and all that entails. Both of those features will be necessarily lost with a JVM back end.
More information about the Openmcl-devel