[Openmcl-devel] Spurious compiler warning?

[Tim Bradshaw]

I think that's right (so I was wrong).  The declaration for the outer things is just a free declaration, not a bound one.  Sorry.


On 9 Dec 2011, at 19:07, Gary Byers wrote:

> You can basically use a TYPE declaration to refer to any visible
> "variable name".  (The terminology's a little confusing, because the
> term "variable" is defined in 3.1.2.1.1 to be roughly "a symbol that's
> not a symbol macro", but the entry for TYPE declarations describes how
> such declarations affect symbol macros.)  The code as written was
> perfectly legal, and CCL only stopped warning about it a few hours ago
> in the trunk.