[Openmcl-devel] erroneous number of arguments in call to REPORT-FILE-COVERAGE and COVERAGE-STATS-HEAD

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Gary Byers <gb at clozure.com> wrote:
> This isn't interesting or unexpected (and no one wants to hear about it :)).
[...]
> The particular case - changing a function and its callers to
> accept/provide a different number of arguments - could be handled
> differently: we might want to note that the callee's signature has
> changed, we might want to see if we'd quietly missed some callers that
> needed to change ...  I don't think that we want to be totally quiet
> about this (if anything, we may want to be more verbose about it.)

which is why I thought you might want to hear about it. :-)

Otherwise, I fully appreciate the bootstrap constraints and
the occasional mismatch between old obsolete definitions
and up-to-date improvements.