[Openmcl-devel] Naming anonymous functions

Gail Zacharias gz at clozure.com
Sat Mar 1 17:57:38 PST 2014

On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Ron Garret <ron at flownet.com> wrote:

> >
> > For debugging purposes, conformingly you could merely put the functions
> > in a hash-table with their "name".
> That's actually a very good idea.  It would have to be a weak hash table,
> and I'd need a custom print-object method for functions, but it would do
> exactly what I want.  Thanks for the suggestion!

That's pretty much what the two-argument ccl::lfun-name does.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clozure.com/pipermail/openmcl-devel/attachments/20140301/be0fcaa1/attachment.htm>

More information about the Openmcl-devel mailing list