[Openmcl-devel] Output from SAM profiler in CCL

[73budden .]

Hi Craig!
  If you meant the followin as the results of running with "time", I
don't see long period of 23 minutes that you described in your "Lisp
comparison" post on sbcl-devel. Time reported some milliseconds. So
this is an insufficient amount of work to make any reasoning about
productivity related to whole work.

Maybe I overlooked something because it is only a few days since I
subscribed to openmcl-devel.

2017-04-20 0:30 GMT+03:00, Craig Lanning <craig.t.lanning at gmail.com>:
> I just ran it again with (time ...) wrapped around it.
>
> looks like it's just spending about 3.6% of its time in GC.
>
> Craig
>
>  8%  CCL::VALUES-SPECIFIER-TYPE  <no source>
>  6%  NIL  <no source>
>  5%  TYPEP  <no source>
>  4%  SXHASH  <no source>
>  4%  EEK::EXP-SYMBOL  (defun EXP-SYMBOL (stream char...
>  3%  CCL::%PARSE-EXPRESSION  <no source>
> (SAM:PROFILE NIL (EE:EXP-ENGINE :COMPARE :MODE :ARM_SHORTFORM :XML-
> OUTPUT T :TRIAL_STEPMOD (PATHNAME "/src/sf/stepmod/") :TRIAL_SCHEMA
> (PATHNAME
> "/src/sf/CR_itemshape_2_20170330/part1000/data/modules/product_and_manu
> facturing_information_with_nominal_3d_models/arm.exp")
> :REFERENCE_STEPMOD (PATHNAME "/src/sf/smrlv6/") :REFERENCE_SCHEMA
> (PATHNAME
> "/src/sf/smrlv6/data/modules/product_and_manufacturing_information_with
> _nominal_3d_models/arm.exp")))
> took 923,118 microseconds (0.923118 seconds) to run.
>       33,361 microseconds (0.033361 seconds, 3.61%) of which was spent
> in GC.
> During that period, and with 4 available CPU cores,
>      852,112 microseconds (0.852112 seconds) were spent in user mode
>       65,065 microseconds (0.065065 seconds) were spent in system mode
>  18,473,008 bytes of memory allocated.
>  720 minor page faults, 0 major page faults, 0 swaps.
>
> On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 17:13 -0400, Joshua Kordani wrote:
>> Does (time... show that you're spending much time in gc?
>>
>>
>> On 4/19/17 4:41 PM, Craig Lanning wrote:
>> >
>> > Here is the output from comparing one pair of Schema files:
>> >
>> > 13%  CCL::SPECIFIER-TYPE  <no source>
>> >   8%  CCL::VALUES-SPECIFIER-TYPE  <no source>
>> >   6%  SXHASH  <no source>
>> >   5%  EEK::EXP-SYMBOL  (defun EXP-SYMBOL (stream char...
>> >   4%  NIL  <no source>
>> >   4%  TYPEP  <no source>
>> >
>> > EEK::EXP-SYMBOL is a function in the custom Lisp Reader that builds
>> > the
>> > tokens while reading the schema files.
>> >
>> > Is CCL::SPECIFIER-TYPE a function related to dispatching methods
>> > within
>> > a generic function?  I use a lot of generic functions and
>> > methods.  Is
>> > there a way to precompile all of the generic function dispatch
>> > code?
>> >
>> > Is there anything I can do collect more info?  This doesn't look
>> > very
>> > useful to me.
>> >
>> > If it was spending a lot of time in methods of a specific generic
>> > function, would that information show up here?
>> >
>> > Craig
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Openmcl-devel mailing list
>> > Openmcl-devel at clozure.com
>> > https://lists.clozure.com/mailman/listinfo/openmcl-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openmcl-devel mailing list
>> Openmcl-devel at clozure.com
>> https://lists.clozure.com/mailman/listinfo/openmcl-devel
> _______________________________________________
> Openmcl-devel mailing list
> Openmcl-devel at clozure.com
> https://lists.clozure.com/mailman/listinfo/openmcl-devel
>