<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>On 3 Oct 2012, at 21:27, Taoufik Dachraoui wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; "><div>I understand your skepticism about accepting match into CCL, but we can consider cond as</div><div>a general and portable stuff. Many languages have a pattern matching built into the language.</div><div>I believe it is very useful and it is deplorable (for me at least) that there is no pattern matching </div><div>built into CCL that is very efficient</div></span></blockquote></div><br><div>I don't think the question is whether the code is interesting or useful, but where the right place for it is. Quicklisp is just a more useful home for stuff since it's cross-platform: I have the same QL packages in both the implementations I use regularly.</div></body></html>