<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Nov 29, 2015, at 2:34 PM, Dmitry Igrishin <<a href="mailto:dfigrish@gmail.com" class="">dfigrish@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class="">Dear developers,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Whether time came to migrate to Git? Are there are any such intentions, or your are comfortable with SVN and it is not a subject</div><div class="">for discussion?</div></div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div>Speaking for myself only, it's just not clear that a switch would be beneficial. It seems like it would just be following a fashion trend. But maybe I'm stupid and ugly. (cf. <a href="https://youtu.be/4XpnKHJAok8?t=487" class="">https://youtu.be/4XpnKHJAok8?t=487</a>)</div><div><br class=""></div><div>We've been using Trac for tickets, and that works well with Subversion. Subversion deals reasonably well with largish binary files (like bootstrapping heap images). Our (ab)use of externals also gives us a way for users to get a working installation with a single command.</div><div><br class=""></div><div><div>I agree that git is very popular, and I know that many people find that github alone is a reason to use git. But I like to host my own stuff, and I just can't see how a switch would improve the life of ccl hackers all that much. Maybe I haven't yet seen the light.</div><div><br class=""></div></div></body></html>