[Openmcl-devel] My Experiences going from 0.13.2 to 0.13.4

Gary Byers gb at clozure.com
Fri Feb 7 01:15:44 UTC 2003



On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, John DeSoi wrote:

>
> When I first ported to OpenMCL a while back loop was not there (or
> for some reason I could not get the port to work). I'll look into
> removing it or making it conditional next time I work on it.
>

LOOP is autoloaded (not built into the image, but loaded the first
time that it's used.)

For a long time, binary releases didn't include the FASL file - I
couldn't quite get my mind around the idea of people actually downloading
just the binary without recompiling everything from source for themselves.

(I confess that I still find the idea a little strange, but I've tried
to remember to include FASLs for loop and step and eval for the last
several releases.  And yes, I agree that it makes little sense to
worry about autoloading a few hundred Kb of code ...)




_______________________________________________
Openmcl-devel mailing list
Openmcl-devel at clozure.com
http://clozure.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openmcl-devel



More information about the Openmcl-devel mailing list