[Openmcl-devel] OpenMCL Versions
Phil
pbpublist at comcast.net
Mon Aug 14 10:21:13 PDT 2006
I've got a 64-bit capable G5 but have never bothered to fire up 64-
bit OpenMCL partly because much of what I'm doing right now is Cocoa-
related (which isn't currently 64-bit) and partly because I'm
skeptical that I'd see any benefit without data sets that require it.
I think 32-bit Intel would be of wider general interest right now as
64-bit would only run on a subset of shipped Intel systems, 32-bit
would run on all of them. (Obviously, I'm not referring to the
subset of apps that need 64-bit today.) Longer term, 64-bit may be
the way to go assuming that OpenMCL could realize a performance gain
that offsets the increased executable size and memory usage.
On Aug 14, 2006, at 12:31 PM, Hamilton Link wrote:
> OSXIntel32 has no users and probably not a huge interest
> compared to
> OSXIntel64, which has no users but will probably interest more and
> more people;
More information about the Openmcl-devel
mailing list