[Openmcl-devel] CCL on Solaris sparc architecture
heller at common-lisp.net
Fri Jan 22 01:19:23 PST 2010
* Gary Byers [2010-01-22 02:17+0100] writes:
> If you think that compiling lisp to C is a good idea, there are
> open-source implementations that do that. Of "precise, relocating GC"
> and "support for native threads", which feature have you decided isn't
> necessary for your application(s) (since you can't compile to C and
> have both) ?
How difficult would be to create a JVM backend? Which features would be
lost? Precise relocating (even parallel) GC and native threads are
taken care of by the JVM.
More information about the Openmcl-devel