[Openmcl-devel] CCL on Solaris sparc architecture

Ron Garret ron at flownet.com
Wed Jan 27 00:13:42 PST 2010

On Jan 22, 2010, at 1:19 AM, Helmut Eller wrote:

> * Gary Byers [2010-01-22 02:17+0100] writes:
>> If you think that compiling lisp to C is a good idea, there are
>> open-source implementations that do that. Of "precise, relocating GC"
>> and "support for native threads", which feature have you decided isn't
>> necessary for your application(s) (since you can't compile to C and
>> have both) ?
> How difficult would be to create a JVM backend?  Which features would be
> lost?  Precise relocating (even parallel) GC and native threads are
> taken care of by the JVM.

Why not just use ABCL?


More information about the Openmcl-devel mailing list