[Openmcl-devel] swank/ccl license

[R. Matthew Emerson]

> On Jan 19, 2018, at 7:39 AM, 73budden . <budden73 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> swank/ccl.lisp is still marked as under LLGPL. Is that ok?

Are you talking about the file swank/ccl.lisp as distributed with slime?

According to the comments in that file, it was written by James Bielman  <jamesjb at jamesjb.com>.  If he wants to change the license to Apache 2 to match CCL, he could certainly do that if he wanted to.