[Openmcl-devel] swank/ccl license

[73budden .]

> Are you talking about the file swank/ccl.lisp as distributed with slime?
Exactly.
> If he wants to change the license to Apache 2 to match CCL, he could certainly do that if he wanted to.
His E-mail does not respond, and it seems he stopped any CL activity
several years ago. While CCL has changed license only recently. Before
that, CCL was LGPL too, so having swank backend for it licensed under
LGPL was a harmonic combination.


2018-01-20 1:23 GMT+03:00, R. Matthew Emerson <rme at acm.org>:
>
>
>> On Jan 19, 2018, at 7:39 AM, 73budden . <budden73 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>> swank/ccl.lisp is still marked as under LLGPL. Is that ok?
>
> Are you talking about the file swank/ccl.lisp as distributed with slime?
>
> According to the comments in that file, it was written by James Bielman
> <jamesjb at jamesjb.com>.  If he wants to change the license to Apache 2 to
> match CCL, he could certainly do that if he wanted to.
>
>
>