[Openmcl-devel] swank/ccl license
Bill St. Clair
wws at clozure.com
Tue Jan 30 04:58:25 PST 2018
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 6:43 AM, Tim Bradshaw <tfb at tfeb.org> wrote:
> I thought the whole point of (L)LGPL was that is intentionally safe for
> components which are combined with non-GPL components by being used as
> libraries. So ccl.lisp should not infect CCL merely by being used as a
> If that's not the case then I don't see what the purpose of the (L)LGPL is
> at all.
Me, too. Some people’s legal departments are more paranoid than others.
Don’t know why they think the “GPL” in (L)LGPL” would make viral a license
that explicitly says it’s NOT viral, except for changes to the licensed
source code itself, but apparently they do.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Openmcl-devel