[Openmcl-devel] OpenMCL Versions
Phil
pbpublist at comcast.net
Thu Aug 17 14:01:07 PDT 2006
Any language/application that includes its own compiler (i.e.
OpenMCL) can't take advantage of the 'little checkbox'/ifdefs that
other apps can. They must to write the behind the scenes code to
make the checkbox/ifdefs possible. It's a tough situation as it's
bad enough that there was one architecture switch, but now we're on
the second in less than a year (I've always bought the rumor that
Apple never wanted IA32 but had to use it from a product timing
standpoint.) I'm sure the Lispworks guys aren't any happier... they
just got their IA32 product out the door a couple of weeks before WWDC.
The first generation of Intel machines has me experiencing a bit of
deja vu as I seem to recall the first generation of PPC machines were
rather quickly not capable of running later software releases due to
differences/limitations between the 601 processors and it's
successors. It will likely not be to the same degree, but does seem
like the same type situation.
On Aug 17, 2006, at 4:29 PM, Justin Fagnani-Bell wrote:
> I'm surprised at the amount of work you
> estimate. I know hardly anything about the x86 ISA or what's involved
> in a Lisp implementation (I gather it's very low level). It's too bad
> that it can't be written so that a few #DEFs and compiler flags will
> produce either a IA32 or EM64T version.
More information about the Openmcl-devel
mailing list