[Openmcl-devel] Anyone using ch-image?

[Cyrus Harmon]

Also, I imagine it wouldn't be too hard to rework tiff-ffi to use  
verazzano and cffi instead of gcc-xml-ffi and sb-alien (or to write  
that CFFI backend to gcc-xml-ffi).

Cyrus

On Jan 10, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Cyrus Harmon wrote:

>
> You should be able to load ch-image without tiff-ffi, but perhaps the
> safe-load hack I wrote is busted. Making ch-image work with openmcl is
> (somewhere) on the list of things to do, but I haven't gotten around
> to it. My guess is that performance will be much better in SBCL, but,
> still, it would be nice if it worked with openmcl.
>
> On a related note, is there a non-ffi TIFF library around?
>
> Cyrus
>
> On Jan 10, 2008, at 3:03 PM, Ron Garret wrote:
>
>> Has anyone successfully loaded ch-image (or any other image  
>> processing
>> library) into CCL?  I'm running into a slew of SBCL-dependencies
>> related to the tiff-ffi library (which ch-image seems to rely on).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> rg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openmcl-devel mailing list
>> Openmcl-devel at clozure.com
>> http://clozure.com/mailman/listinfo/openmcl-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openmcl-devel mailing list
> Openmcl-devel at clozure.com
> http://clozure.com/mailman/listinfo/openmcl-devel