[Openmcl-devel] Anyone using ch-image?

[Ron Garret]

Thanks.  It appears I have more basic problems.  I tried loading ch- 
image using sbcl and it turns out that my libtiff is left over from my  
PPC days.  Trick is, I have no idea where it came from.  It's in /opt/ 
local/lib so it seems to be a darwinport, but there doesn't actually  
seem to be a darwinport of libtiff.  Grrrr....

I hate computers.

rg

On Jan 10, 2008, at 4:54 PM, Cyrus Harmon wrote:

> Also, I imagine it wouldn't be too hard to rework tiff-ffi to use  
> verazzano and cffi instead of gcc-xml-ffi and sb-alien (or to write  
> that CFFI backend to gcc-xml-ffi).
>
> Cyrus
>
> On Jan 10, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Cyrus Harmon wrote:
>
>>
>> You should be able to load ch-image without tiff-ffi, but perhaps the
>> safe-load hack I wrote is busted. Making ch-image work with openmcl  
>> is
>> (somewhere) on the list of things to do, but I haven't gotten around
>> to it. My guess is that performance will be much better in SBCL, but,
>> still, it would be nice if it worked with openmcl.
>>
>> On a related note, is there a non-ffi TIFF library around?
>>
>> Cyrus
>>
>> On Jan 10, 2008, at 3:03 PM, Ron Garret wrote:
>>
>>> Has anyone successfully loaded ch-image (or any other image  
>>> processing
>>> library) into CCL?  I'm running into a slew of SBCL-dependencies
>>> related to the tiff-ffi library (which ch-image seems to rely on).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> rg
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openmcl-devel mailing list
>>> Openmcl-devel at clozure.com
>>> http://clozure.com/mailman/listinfo/openmcl-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openmcl-devel mailing list
>> Openmcl-devel at clozure.com
>> http://clozure.com/mailman/listinfo/openmcl-devel