[Openmcl-devel] Is there a way to suppress this warning?

[Gary Byers]

I haven't looked at this yet, but am curious and will try to look at it 
soon.
iirc, the spec says that the results of this case are undefined. I'm not 
even
sure whether CCL gleefully inlines what looks like a call to CL+ in this 
case,
or if respects and uses the local definition, and if I do RC, both 
behaviors are
allowed.

a few years ago, we had a customer who expected a warning or possibly an
error in this case (possibly because they were used to another CL 
implementation's
behavior, or possibly because they didn't understand the phrase "the 
results are undefined".
that's not important now.  What -is- important is that their employer 
waved money in our
faces and asked us to change this, and we did.

Sometimes, the principle of the thing is more important than money is.  
This was not one
of those times.


On 04/30/2015 02:25 PM, Karsten Poeck wrote:
> On 30.04.15 21:36, Karsten Poeck wrote:
>> On 30.04.15 20:08, Ron Garret wrote:
>>> (flet ((+ () t)) t)
>> Not sure whether you consider this a solution, but did you try 
>> shadowing +?
> I am aware that you wrote "The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Common Lisp 
> Packages", just wonder why you didn't use packages here.
>
> Karsten
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openmcl-devel mailing list
> Openmcl-devel at clozure.com
> https://lists.clozure.com/mailman/listinfo/openmcl-devel